Enhancing Crosslink Density with Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether in UV-Stable Coatings

Introduction

Ultraviolet (UV)-curable coatings have gained significant traction across various industries due to their rapid curing speed, low volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, and excellent mechanical and chemical resistance. However, achieving optimal UV stability in these coatings remains a crucial challenge. Degradation due to prolonged UV exposure can manifest as yellowing, cracking, loss of gloss, and diminished protective performance. Enhancing the crosslink density of the coating network is a well-established strategy to improve its UV resistance by reducing polymer chain mobility and minimizing the diffusion of degradation products.

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether, often abbreviated as BDMAEE or Jeffcat ZF-10, is a tertiary amine catalyst widely used in polyurethane (PU) foam production. However, its potential as a crosslinking promoter in UV-curable coatings, especially those requiring enhanced UV stability, is increasingly recognized. This article delves into the mechanisms by which BDMAEE enhances crosslink density, its application in various UV-curable systems, and its impact on the overall performance, particularly UV stability, of the resulting coatings.

1. Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether: Properties and Mechanism

1.1. Chemical Structure and Properties

BDMAEE is a tertiary amine compound with the chemical formula C₁₂H₂₈N₂O. Its structure consists of an ether linkage connecting two dimethylaminoethyl groups. Key properties of BDMAEE are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Properties of Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether

Reference: [1] Supplier Technical Data Sheet (e.g., Huntsman, Air Products) – Note: specific values can vary slightly between suppliers.

1.2. Mechanism of Action in UV-Curable Coatings

BDMAEE acts as a catalyst to promote crosslinking reactions in UV-curable systems, particularly those based on acrylates and epoxies. Its mechanism of action can be described as follows:

• Base Catalysis: BDMAEE, being a tertiary amine, acts as a nucleophilic base. It abstracts a proton from acidic groups present in the resin system or generated during the UV curing process (e.g., from carboxylic acid groups or hydroxyl groups). This proton abstraction increases the reactivity of other functional groups, such as acrylates or epoxies, towards crosslinking.

• Promotion of Isocyanate Reactions (in PU Systems): In UV-curable polyurethane (PU) coatings, BDMAEE accelerates the reaction between isocyanates and hydroxyl-containing components. This is a critical step in the formation of the urethane linkages that define the PU network. The nitrogen atom in BDMAEE coordinates with the isocyanate group, increasing its electrophilicity and making it more susceptible to nucleophilic attack by the hydroxyl group.

• Chain Transfer Agent (in certain acrylate systems): In some acrylate-based UV-curable systems, BDMAEE can act as a chain transfer agent, influencing the polymerization process. While not directly involved in crosslinking, its presence can lead to a more controlled polymerization and potentially higher crosslink density by affecting the chain length and branching of the polymer network.

• Reaction with Photoinitiators: BDMAEE can interact with certain photoinitiators, particularly those that generate acidic byproducts upon UV exposure. This interaction can neutralize the acidic byproducts and prevent them from inhibiting the polymerization process. This indirect effect can also contribute to a higher overall crosslink density.

The specific mechanism by which BDMAEE influences crosslinking depends on the specific resin system and photoinitiator used. However, the overall effect is typically an increase in the rate and extent of crosslinking, leading to a denser and more robust coating network.

2. Application of BDMAEE in UV-Curable Coatings

BDMAEE finds application in various UV-curable coating formulations, including:

• UV-Curable Polyurethane (PU) Coatings: These coatings are known for their excellent flexibility, abrasion resistance, and chemical resistance. BDMAEE plays a crucial role in accelerating the urethane reaction, ensuring rapid curing and high crosslink density.

• UV-Curable Acrylate Coatings: Acrylate-based coatings are widely used in applications requiring high hardness, scratch resistance, and gloss. BDMAEE can enhance the crosslinking of acrylates, leading to improved mechanical properties and solvent resistance.

• UV-Curable Epoxy Coatings: Epoxy-based coatings are valued for their excellent adhesion, chemical resistance, and electrical insulation properties. BDMAEE can promote the crosslinking of epoxies with hardeners, resulting in a denser and more durable coating.

Table 2: Typical Applications of BDMAEE in UV-Curable Coatings

3. Impact of BDMAEE on Coating Properties

The addition of BDMAEE to UV-curable coating formulations has a significant impact on the properties of the resulting coatings.

3.1. Crosslink Density:

The primary effect of BDMAEE is to increase the crosslink density of the coating network. This increase is a direct consequence of the mechanisms described in Section 1.2. Higher crosslink density translates to improved mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and, critically, UV stability.

3.2. Mechanical Properties:

• Hardness: Increased crosslink density generally leads to higher hardness. This is because the denser network restricts the movement of polymer chains, making the coating more resistant to indentation.
• Tensile Strength and Elongation: The effect on tensile strength and elongation is more complex and depends on the specific formulation. While higher crosslink density can increase tensile strength, it can also reduce elongation at break, making the coating more brittle. Careful optimization of the formulation is necessary to achieve the desired balance of these properties.
• Abrasion Resistance: Higher crosslink density typically improves abrasion resistance. The denser network provides a stronger barrier against wear and tear.

Table 3: Effect of BDMAEE on Mechanical Properties (Typical Trends)

3.3. Chemical Resistance:

Higher crosslink density enhances the chemical resistance of the coating. The denser network reduces the penetration of solvents, acids, and bases, protecting the underlying substrate from corrosion and degradation.

3.4. UV Stability:

The most significant benefit of using BDMAEE is the improvement in UV stability. Higher crosslink density reduces polymer chain mobility, minimizing the diffusion of degradation products formed during UV exposure. This reduces yellowing, cracking, and loss of gloss. Furthermore, a denser network can better withstand the stresses induced by UV radiation.

Table 4: Effect of BDMAEE on UV Stability (Typical Trends)

4. Factors Affecting the Performance of BDMAEE in UV-Curable Coatings

The effectiveness of BDMAEE in enhancing crosslink density and UV stability depends on several factors:

• Resin System: The type of resin used (e.g., polyurethane, acrylate, epoxy) significantly affects the mechanism and extent of BDMAEE’s influence on crosslinking.
• Photoinitiator: The choice of photoinitiator is crucial. Certain photoinitiators may be more compatible with BDMAEE than others, and some may even interact with BDMAEE in a detrimental way. Careful selection is essential.
• BDMAEE Concentration: The optimal concentration of BDMAEE needs to be carefully determined. Too little BDMAEE may not provide sufficient crosslinking, while too much can lead to undesirable side effects, such as embrittlement or yellowing.
• Curing Conditions: UV intensity, exposure time, and temperature all influence the curing process and the effectiveness of BDMAEE.
• Additives: Other additives in the formulation, such as UV absorbers, hindered amine light stabilizers (HALS), and antioxidants, can interact with BDMAEE and affect its performance.

5. Formulation Considerations and Optimization

Formulating UV-curable coatings with BDMAEE requires careful consideration of the factors mentioned above. The following guidelines can help optimize the formulation:

• Resin Selection: Choose a resin system that is compatible with BDMAEE and suitable for the desired application. Consider the functional groups present in the resin and their reactivity with BDMAEE.
• Photoinitiator Selection: Select a photoinitiator that is compatible with both the resin system and BDMAEE. Avoid photoinitiators that generate acidic byproducts that can be neutralized by BDMAEE, as this can reduce its effectiveness as a crosslinking promoter.
• BDMAEE Concentration Optimization: Perform a series of experiments to determine the optimal concentration of BDMAEE. Start with a low concentration and gradually increase it, monitoring the effect on crosslink density, mechanical properties, and UV stability. Techniques such as Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) can be used to assess crosslink density.
• Additive Selection: Incorporate UV absorbers and HALS to further enhance UV stability. These additives work synergistically with BDMAEE to protect the coating from UV degradation. Antioxidants can also be added to prevent thermal oxidation during the curing process.
• Curing Condition Optimization: Optimize the curing conditions to ensure complete curing and maximum crosslink density. Adjust the UV intensity, exposure time, and temperature as needed.
• Testing and Evaluation: Thoroughly test and evaluate the performance of the coating, including mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and UV stability. Use standardized test methods to ensure accurate and reliable results.

6. Challenges and Future Trends

While BDMAEE offers significant benefits in enhancing crosslink density and UV stability, there are also some challenges associated with its use:

• Yellowing: In some formulations, high concentrations of BDMAEE can contribute to yellowing of the coating, especially upon UV exposure. This can be mitigated by using lower concentrations of BDMAEE, incorporating UV absorbers and HALS, and selecting a photoinitiator that minimizes yellowing.
• Odor: BDMAEE has a characteristic amine odor, which can be objectionable in some applications. Using encapsulated BDMAEE or incorporating odor masking agents can help reduce the odor.
• Migration: BDMAEE can migrate out of the coating over time, especially in flexible coatings. This can lead to a reduction in performance and potential health and environmental concerns. Using higher molecular weight amine catalysts or chemically bonding the catalyst to the resin can help prevent migration.

Future trends in the use of BDMAEE in UV-curable coatings include:

• Development of New BDMAEE Derivatives: Researchers are developing new derivatives of BDMAEE with improved properties, such as lower odor, reduced yellowing, and enhanced compatibility with various resin systems.
• Combination with Nanomaterials: Combining BDMAEE with nanomaterials, such as silica nanoparticles or carbon nanotubes, can further enhance the mechanical properties, UV stability, and other performance characteristics of the coating.
• Use in Waterborne UV-Curable Coatings: Waterborne UV-curable coatings are gaining popularity due to their low VOC emissions. BDMAEE can be used in these coatings to enhance crosslinking and improve performance.
• Development of "Smart" UV-Curable Coatings: BDMAEE can be incorporated into "smart" UV-curable coatings that respond to external stimuli, such as temperature or pH. This can be used to create coatings with self-healing properties or other advanced functionalities.

7. Conclusion

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether (BDMAEE) is a valuable additive for enhancing the crosslink density and UV stability of UV-curable coatings. Its ability to promote crosslinking reactions in various resin systems, particularly polyurethanes, acrylates, and epoxies, makes it a versatile tool for formulators. By carefully optimizing the formulation and curing conditions, BDMAEE can be used to create high-performance UV-curable coatings with excellent mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and UV stability. While challenges such as yellowing and odor need to be addressed, ongoing research and development are leading to new and improved BDMAEE derivatives and applications, paving the way for even more advanced UV-curable coating technologies. The continued exploration of BDMAEE’s potential will undoubtedly contribute to the development of more durable, sustainable, and high-performing coatings for a wide range of industries.

Literature Sources (Fictitious Examples – Replace with Actual Citations)

[1] Smith, A. B., & Jones, C. D. (2010). UV-Curable Coatings: Principles and Applications. Wiley-VCH.

[2] Brown, E. F., et al. (2015). The effect of tertiary amine catalysts on the UV stability of polyurethane coatings. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 132(10), 41723.

[3] Garcia, L. M., & Rodriguez, P. R. (2018). Crosslinking mechanisms in acrylate-based UV-curable systems. Progress in Polymer Science, 80, 1-30.

[4] Lee, S. H., et al. (2020). Enhanced UV stability of epoxy coatings using bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether and hindered amine light stabilizers. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 175, 109113.

[5] Kim, J. Y., & Park, K. S. (2022). The role of BDMAEE in waterborne UV-curable polyurethane coatings. Journal of Coatings Technology and Research, 19(3), 657-667.

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/fomrez-sul-11a-catalyst-momentive/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/40466

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/pc-cat-np109-low-odor-tertiary-amine-hard-foam-catalyst-nitro/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/1163

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/44478

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/di-n-octyloxotin/

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/addocat-106-teda-l33b-dabco-polycat/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/43910

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Dimethylbenzylamine-CAS-103-83-3-N-dimthylbenzylamine.pdf

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/44326

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether (BDMAEE) for Low-Migration Food Packaging Materials Compliance: A Comprehensive Overview

Introduction

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether (BDMAEE), also known as DABCO® NE1060 (a registered trademark of Evonik Operations GmbH), is a tertiary amine catalyst widely employed in the production of polyurethane (PU) foams. Its primary role is to accelerate the reaction between isocyanates and polyols, leading to the formation of the urethane linkage. While BDMAEE offers significant benefits in PU foam manufacturing, its potential for migration from food packaging materials and subsequent consumer exposure raises concerns regarding food safety. This article provides a comprehensive overview of BDMAEE, focusing on its properties, applications in PU foam production, migration potential, regulatory compliance for food packaging materials, and strategies for minimizing its presence in food contact articles. We will explore various aspects, including product parameters, applications, safety considerations, and future trends, while adhering to rigorous and standardized language.

1. Product Overview

BDMAEE is a clear, colorless to slightly yellow liquid with a characteristic amine odor. It is soluble in water and most organic solvents. Its chemical structure features two dimethylaminoethyl groups linked by an ether linkage, providing two tertiary amine functionalities capable of catalyzing the urethane reaction.

1.1 Chemical Structure and Formula

• Chemical Name: Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether
• Synonyms: 2,2′-Dimorpholinyldiethyl Ether; Dimethylaminoethyl Ether; DABCO® NE1060
• CAS Registry Number: 3033-62-3
• Molecular Formula: C??H??N?O
• Molecular Weight: 214.35 g/mol
• Structural Formula: (CH?)?N-CH?CH?-O-CH?CH?-N(CH?)?

1.2 Physical and Chemical Properties

1.3 Product Specifications

The following table presents typical product specifications for commercially available BDMAEE:

2. Applications in Polyurethane Foam Production

BDMAEE is primarily used as a tertiary amine catalyst in the production of various types of PU foams, including flexible, rigid, and semi-rigid foams. Its efficacy in accelerating the urethane reaction makes it crucial for achieving desired foam properties and processing characteristics.

2.1 Catalytic Mechanism

BDMAEE acts as a nucleophilic catalyst, accelerating the reaction between isocyanates and polyols. The nitrogen atom in the tertiary amine group abstracts a proton from the hydroxyl group of the polyol, increasing its nucleophilicity and facilitating its attack on the electrophilic carbon atom of the isocyanate group. This process leads to the formation of the urethane linkage and the release of carbon dioxide, which acts as a blowing agent.

2.2 Types of PU Foams

• Flexible Foams: Used in mattresses, upholstery, and automotive seating. BDMAEE helps control the cell structure and density of flexible foams, contributing to their comfort and resilience.
• Rigid Foams: Used in insulation panels, refrigerators, and structural components. BDMAEE is crucial for achieving the desired closed-cell structure and thermal insulation properties of rigid foams.
• Semi-Rigid Foams: Used in automotive parts and packaging applications. BDMAEE provides a balance between flexibility and rigidity, making these foams suitable for impact absorption and cushioning.

2.3 Advantages of Using BDMAEE

• High Catalytic Activity: BDMAEE is a highly efficient catalyst, requiring relatively low concentrations to achieve desired reaction rates.
• Good Solubility: Its solubility in polyols and isocyanates ensures uniform distribution within the reaction mixture, leading to consistent foam properties.
• Controlled Reaction Rate: BDMAEE allows for precise control over the urethane reaction rate, enabling optimization of foam processing parameters.
• Improved Foam Properties: BDMAEE can contribute to improved foam properties, such as cell structure, density, and mechanical strength.

3. Migration Potential and Food Safety Concerns

While BDMAEE is essential for PU foam production, its potential to migrate from food packaging materials into food poses a risk to consumer health. The migration process is influenced by several factors, including the concentration of BDMAEE in the foam, the type of food being packaged, the temperature and duration of storage, and the barrier properties of the packaging material.

3.1 Factors Influencing Migration

• Concentration in the Foam: Higher concentrations of BDMAEE in the PU foam increase the driving force for migration.
• Type of Food: Fatty foods tend to absorb more BDMAEE than aqueous foods due to the lipophilic nature of the amine.
• Temperature and Duration: Elevated temperatures and prolonged storage periods accelerate the migration process.
• Packaging Material: The barrier properties of the packaging material play a crucial role in preventing or minimizing migration. Materials with low permeability to BDMAEE, such as aluminum foil or certain polymers with high density, can effectively reduce migration.
• Foam Structure: Open-cell foams generally exhibit higher migration rates compared to closed-cell foams due to the larger surface area exposed to the food.

3.2 Health Risks Associated with Exposure

Exposure to BDMAEE through food consumption can potentially lead to various health effects, including:

• Irritation: BDMAEE can cause irritation of the skin, eyes, and respiratory tract upon direct contact.
• Allergic Reactions: Some individuals may experience allergic reactions upon exposure to BDMAEE.
• Toxicological Concerns: Studies have raised concerns about the potential for BDMAEE to cause developmental or reproductive toxicity at high doses. Further research is needed to fully assess the long-term health effects of low-level exposure through food consumption.

3.3 Methods for Detecting Migration

Several analytical techniques are employed to detect and quantify the migration of BDMAEE from food packaging materials into food simulants. These methods typically involve extraction, separation, and detection steps.

• Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS): This technique is widely used for identifying and quantifying volatile organic compounds, including BDMAEE, in food simulants.
• Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS): This technique is suitable for analyzing non-volatile or thermally labile compounds, and can be used to detect BDMAEE after derivatization.
• Headspace Gas Chromatography (HS-GC): This technique involves analyzing the volatile compounds present in the headspace above a sample, providing a sensitive method for detecting BDMAEE migration.

4. Regulatory Compliance for Food Packaging Materials

Due to the potential health risks associated with BDMAEE migration, regulatory bodies worldwide have established guidelines and regulations governing its use in food packaging materials. These regulations aim to minimize consumer exposure to BDMAEE and ensure food safety.

4.1 European Union (EU)

• Regulation (EC) No 1935/2004: This framework regulation establishes the general principles for all food contact materials, requiring them to be safe, inert, and not to transfer their constituents to food in quantities that could endanger human health or bring about an unacceptable change in the composition of the food.
• Regulation (EU) No 10/2011: This regulation specifically addresses plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. It establishes specific migration limits (SMLs) for certain substances, including amines, but does not have a specific SML for BDMAEE. However, it does include an overall migration limit (OML) of 10 mg/dm² for plastic materials. Manufacturers must ensure that the total migration of all substances from the plastic material does not exceed this limit.
• EFSA Opinions: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) provides scientific opinions on the safety of substances used in food contact materials. EFSA has evaluated the safety of BDMAEE and may provide guidance on acceptable exposure levels.

4.2 United States (US)

• Food and Drug Administration (FDA): The FDA regulates food contact substances in the US. Substances used in food packaging must be either generally recognized as safe (GRAS) or approved through a food contact notification (FCN) process. While BDMAEE is not specifically listed in FDA regulations for direct food contact, it may be used in indirect food contact applications if it meets certain criteria and does not result in significant migration into food.
• 21 CFR Part 175: This section of the Code of Federal Regulations addresses indirect food additives, including components of paper and paperboard in contact with food.
• 21 CFR Part 177: This section addresses indirect food additives, including polymers.

4.3 China

• GB Standards: China has a series of national standards (GB standards) that regulate food contact materials and articles. These standards specify requirements for materials, testing methods, and migration limits. Relevant GB standards include:
  • GB 4806.1-2016: General safety requirements for food contact materials and articles.
  • GB 9685-2016: Hygienic standards for uses of additives in food containers and packaging materials.
  • GB 31604.1-2015: General principles for the migration test of food contact materials and articles.

4.4 Other Regions

Many other countries and regions have their own regulations and guidelines for food contact materials, often based on the principles established by the EU and the US. Manufacturers must comply with the specific regulations of the countries where their products are sold.

5. Strategies for Minimizing BDMAEE Migration

Several strategies can be implemented to minimize the migration of BDMAEE from PU foams used in food packaging applications. These strategies focus on reducing the concentration of BDMAEE in the foam, improving the foam’s structure, and enhancing the barrier properties of the packaging material.

5.1 Reducing BDMAEE Concentration

• Optimize Catalyst Dosage: Carefully optimize the dosage of BDMAEE to ensure that only the minimum amount required for achieving desired foam properties is used.
• Use Alternative Catalysts: Explore the use of alternative catalysts that are less prone to migration or have lower toxicity profiles. Examples include reactive amine catalysts that become chemically bound to the polymer matrix during the foaming process, or metal catalysts.
• Post-Curing: Implement a post-curing process to further react any residual isocyanates and polyols, reducing the potential for BDMAEE release. Post-curing involves exposing the foam to elevated temperatures for a specified period, promoting further crosslinking and reducing the concentration of unreacted components.

5.2 Improving Foam Structure

• Closed-Cell Foam: Utilize closed-cell foam structures whenever possible, as they offer a lower surface area for migration compared to open-cell foams.
• Optimize Cell Size: Optimize the cell size and uniformity of the foam to minimize the surface area exposed to the food.
• Surface Treatment: Apply surface treatments to the foam to seal the surface and reduce migration.

5.3 Enhancing Barrier Properties

• Lamination: Laminate the PU foam with a barrier layer, such as aluminum foil, polyethylene (PE), or polypropylene (PP), to prevent migration.
• Coatings: Apply barrier coatings to the surface of the foam to reduce its permeability to BDMAEE.
• Modified Atmosphere Packaging (MAP): Employ modified atmosphere packaging techniques to reduce the rate of degradation and migration.

5.4 Selection of Raw Materials

• High-Purity Raw Materials: Use high-purity polyols and isocyanates to minimize the presence of impurities that could contribute to migration.
• Low-Migration Additives: Select additives, such as surfactants and stabilizers, that have low migration potential.

6. Future Trends and Research Directions

The field of food packaging materials is constantly evolving, with a focus on developing safer and more sustainable solutions. Future trends and research directions related to BDMAEE and other amine catalysts include:

• Development of Reactive Amine Catalysts: Research is ongoing to develop reactive amine catalysts that become chemically bound to the polymer matrix during the foaming process, eliminating the potential for migration.
• Bio-Based Catalysts: Exploration of bio-based catalysts derived from renewable resources as alternatives to traditional amine catalysts.
• Advanced Analytical Techniques: Development of more sensitive and accurate analytical techniques for detecting and quantifying trace levels of amine migration in food simulants.
• Risk Assessment and Modeling: Refinement of risk assessment models to better predict the migration behavior of amine catalysts and assess the potential health risks associated with exposure.
• Sustainable Packaging Materials: Development of sustainable packaging materials that are biodegradable or compostable, reducing the environmental impact of food packaging waste.

7. Conclusion

BDMAEE is a valuable catalyst in the production of PU foams used in various applications, including food packaging. However, its potential for migration and associated health risks necessitate careful consideration and implementation of strategies to minimize exposure. Regulatory compliance is paramount, and manufacturers must adhere to the specific regulations of the countries where their products are sold. By optimizing catalyst dosage, improving foam structure, enhancing barrier properties, and exploring alternative catalysts, it is possible to significantly reduce the migration of BDMAEE and ensure the safety of food packaging materials. Continued research and development efforts are crucial for advancing the field of food packaging materials and creating safer and more sustainable solutions for the future. The ongoing development of reactive and bio-based catalysts, along with advanced analytical techniques and refined risk assessment models, will contribute to minimizing the risks associated with amine migration and ensuring the safety of food products for consumers.

Literature Sources

• EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). Scientific Opinion on the safety assessment of substances used in plastic food contact materials. EFSA Journal, various years. (Note: Specify the relevant EFSA opinions based on specific substances and years)
• FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 175 and 177.
• GB Standards. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China for Food Contact Materials and Articles. (Note: Specify the relevant GB standards based on material type and application)
• Kirwan, M. J., & Strawbridge, J. W. (2003). Plastics packaging and food safety. Pira International.
• Robertson, G. L. (2016). Food Packaging: Principles and Practice. CRC press.
• Wypych, G. (2017). Handbook of Polymers. ChemTec Publishing.
• Dominguez, A. R., et al. (2019). Migration of amine catalysts from polyurethane foams into food simulants. Food Chemistry, 283, 450-457. (Note: This is a placeholder, replace with actual relevant research papers).
• Smith, J. P., et al. (2020). Evaluation of alternative catalysts for polyurethane foam production with reduced migration potential. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 137(10), 48501. (Note: This is a placeholder, replace with actual relevant research papers).

This article provides a detailed overview of BDMAEE, its applications, safety concerns, and strategies for minimizing migration. Remember to replace the placeholder literature sources with actual relevant research papers.

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/category/products/page/169

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/jeffcat-dmdee-catalyst-cas11225-78-5-huntsman/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/tegoamin-bde-catalyst-cas121-54-0-degussa-ag/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/94

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/43950

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/dabco-ne1060-catalyst-cas10046-12-1-evonik-germany/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/1808

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/-NE500-non-emission-amine-catalyst-NE500-strong-gel-amine-catalyst-NE500.pdf

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/672

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/42767

Optimizing Cure Profiles Using Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether in Flexible Polyurethane Foams

Introduction

Flexible polyurethane (PU) foams are widely used in various applications, including furniture, bedding, automotive interiors, and packaging, due to their excellent cushioning properties, high resilience, and cost-effectiveness. The formation of flexible PU foam involves a complex interplay of chemical reactions, primarily the reaction between polyols and isocyanates, leading to chain extension and crosslinking, coupled with blowing reactions generating carbon dioxide gas that expands the polymer matrix. The balance between these reactions is crucial for achieving the desired foam properties, such as density, cell size, and mechanical strength. Catalysts play a vital role in controlling the kinetics and selectivity of these reactions.

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether (BDMAEE), often referred to as a blowing catalyst, is a tertiary amine catalyst extensively used in flexible PU foam production. It is known for its selective promotion of the water-isocyanate reaction, generating carbon dioxide, which acts as the blowing agent. The efficacy of BDMAEE in achieving optimal foam properties is highly dependent on its concentration, the type of polyol and isocyanate used, and the presence of other additives. This article will delve into the role of BDMAEE in flexible PU foam cure profiles, focusing on its reaction mechanism, effects on foam properties, optimization strategies, and a comparison with other commonly used amine catalysts.

1. Flexible Polyurethane Foam Formation: A Chemical Overview

The production of flexible PU foam primarily involves two key reactions:

• Polyol-Isocyanate Reaction (Gelation): This reaction involves the nucleophilic attack of a hydroxyl group (-OH) from the polyol on the isocyanate group (-NCO), forming a urethane linkage (-NHCOO-). This reaction leads to chain extension and crosslinking, increasing the viscosity of the reaction mixture and providing structural integrity to the foam.

  R-OH + R'-NCO  ?  R-NHCOO-R'

• Water-Isocyanate Reaction (Blowing): Water reacts with the isocyanate group to form an unstable carbamic acid, which then decomposes into an amine and carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide gas expands the polymer matrix, creating the cellular structure of the foam.

  R-NCO + H2O  ?  R-NHCOOH  ?  R-NH2 + CO2

  R-NH2 + R'-NCO  ?  R-NHCONH-R' (Urea)

The urea formed in the second step further reacts with isocyanate, contributing to chain extension and crosslinking. The relative rates of these two reactions significantly influence the final foam structure and properties.

1.1 Raw Materials

Several raw materials are essential for the production of flexible polyurethane foam:

• Polyols: These are the primary reactants, contributing to the polymer backbone. Common polyols used in flexible PU foam include polyether polyols and polyester polyols. Their molecular weight, functionality (number of hydroxyl groups per molecule), and type determine the foam’s flexibility, resilience, and other properties.

• Isocyanates: These react with polyols and water to form the polymer network and generate CO2. Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI) are the most common isocyanates used. The choice between TDI and MDI significantly affects the foam’s processing characteristics and final properties.

• Water: Water acts as the primary blowing agent, reacting with isocyanate to generate carbon dioxide. The amount of water used directly controls the foam’s density.

• Catalysts: Catalysts accelerate the polyol-isocyanate and water-isocyanate reactions. Amine catalysts and organometallic catalysts are typically used in combination to achieve the desired reaction balance.

• Surfactants: Surfactants stabilize the foam bubbles during expansion, preventing collapse and ensuring a uniform cell structure. Silicone surfactants are commonly used.

• Other Additives: Flame retardants, colorants, fillers, and stabilizers may be added to modify the foam’s properties and processing characteristics.

2. Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] Ether (BDMAEE): Properties and Mechanism

BDMAEE is a tertiary amine catalyst with the chemical formula (CH3)2NCH2CH2OCH2CH2N(CH3)2. It is a colorless to slightly yellow liquid with a characteristic amine odor.

Table 1: Physical and Chemical Properties of BDMAEE

2.1 Catalytic Mechanism

BDMAEE acts as a nucleophilic catalyst, accelerating the reaction between water and isocyanate. The mechanism involves the following steps:

1. Proton Abstraction: The lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom of BDMAEE abstracts a proton from a water molecule, generating a hydroxyl ion (OH?) and a protonated amine catalyst.

2. Nucleophilic Attack: The hydroxyl ion then attacks the electrophilic carbon atom of the isocyanate group, forming a carbamate intermediate.

3. Proton Transfer: A proton is transferred from the protonated amine catalyst to the carbamate intermediate, leading to the formation of carbamic acid.

4. Decomposition: The carbamic acid decomposes into an amine and carbon dioxide. The amine can then react with another isocyanate molecule to form urea.

The catalyst is regenerated in the process, allowing it to participate in subsequent reactions. The selectivity of BDMAEE towards the water-isocyanate reaction is attributed to its steric hindrance and electronic effects, which favor the activation of water over polyols.

3. Influence of BDMAEE on Foam Properties

The concentration of BDMAEE significantly influences the cure profile and final properties of flexible PU foam.

3.1 Impact on Reaction Kinetics

• Cream Time: Cream time is the time elapsed from the mixing of all ingredients until the mixture starts to rise. BDMAEE accelerates the initial stages of the reaction, leading to a shorter cream time. Higher concentrations of BDMAEE result in even faster cream times.

• Rise Time: Rise time is the time elapsed from the mixing of all ingredients until the foam reaches its maximum height. BDMAEE promotes the generation of carbon dioxide, accelerating the blowing process and shortening the rise time.

• Gel Time: Gel time is the time elapsed until the foam loses its fluidity and becomes a gel. BDMAEE indirectly affects gel time by influencing the consumption of isocyanate. However, the primary driver of gel time is the polyol-isocyanate reaction, which is typically catalyzed by a separate gelation catalyst.

3.2 Impact on Foam Structure

• Cell Size: The concentration of BDMAEE affects the cell size of the foam. Higher concentrations of BDMAEE can lead to smaller cell sizes due to the faster generation of carbon dioxide, which creates more nucleation sites for bubble formation. However, excessive amounts of BDMAEE can lead to very small and closed cells, which can negatively impact the foam’s breathability and compression set.

• Cell Opening: BDMAEE promotes the opening of cells during the foam expansion process. This is crucial for achieving good airflow and breathability in flexible PU foam. The proper balance of blowing and gelation reactions, facilitated by BDMAEE, ensures that the cell walls rupture before the foam solidifies, creating an open-cell structure.

• Foam Density: The amount of water and BDMAEE used directly affects the foam’s density. Increasing the concentration of BDMAEE, while keeping the water content constant, generally leads to a lower density foam due to the increased efficiency of carbon dioxide generation.

3.3 Impact on Mechanical Properties

• Tensile Strength: Tensile strength is the maximum stress a material can withstand before breaking under tension. The concentration of BDMAEE can indirectly affect tensile strength by influencing the foam’s cell structure and density. A more uniform and open-cell structure, achieved with optimized BDMAEE levels, can contribute to higher tensile strength.

• Tear Strength: Tear strength is the resistance of a material to tearing. Similar to tensile strength, tear strength is influenced by the foam’s cell structure and density.

• Compression Set: Compression set is a measure of the permanent deformation of a material after being subjected to a compressive load for a specific period. Optimized BDMAEE concentrations can contribute to lower compression set values, indicating better long-term performance of the foam.

• Resilience: Resilience is the ability of a material to recover its original shape after being deformed. The appropriate level of BDMAEE helps achieve the optimal balance between blowing and gelation reactions, resulting in a foam with good resilience.

Table 2: Influence of BDMAEE Concentration on Foam Properties

4. Optimization Strategies for BDMAEE Usage

Optimizing the use of BDMAEE in flexible PU foam formulations requires careful consideration of various factors, including the type of polyol and isocyanate, the desired foam properties, and the presence of other additives.

4.1 Formulation Adjustments

• Polyol Selection: The type of polyol used (e.g., polyether polyol, polyester polyol) significantly impacts the reaction kinetics and foam properties. Adjusting the BDMAEE concentration based on the polyol’s reactivity is crucial. For example, more reactive polyols may require lower BDMAEE concentrations to avoid excessively fast reactions.

• Isocyanate Index: The isocyanate index, defined as the ratio of isocyanate groups to hydroxyl groups (NCO/OH), affects the crosslinking density and foam hardness. Adjusting the isocyanate index in conjunction with BDMAEE optimization can fine-tune the foam’s mechanical properties.

• Water Content: The amount of water used as a blowing agent directly influences the foam’s density. Optimizing the water content in conjunction with BDMAEE concentration is essential to achieve the desired density and cell structure.

• Surfactant Selection: Surfactants play a crucial role in stabilizing the foam bubbles and ensuring a uniform cell structure. The choice of surfactant should be compatible with the BDMAEE catalyst and other formulation components.

• Co-Catalysts: BDMAEE is often used in combination with a gelation catalyst, typically an organometallic catalyst such as stannous octoate. Optimizing the ratio of BDMAEE to the gelation catalyst is crucial for achieving the desired balance between blowing and gelation reactions. Delayed-action catalysts can also be considered to provide better control over the reaction profile.

4.2 Processing Parameters

• Mixing Speed: The mixing speed during foam production affects the homogeneity of the reaction mixture and the dispersion of the catalyst. Optimizing the mixing speed ensures that the BDMAEE catalyst is uniformly distributed throughout the formulation.

• Temperature: The temperature of the raw materials and the reaction mixture influences the reaction kinetics. Maintaining a consistent temperature is important for reproducible foam properties.

• Machine Settings: For automated foam production, optimizing machine settings such as pump rates and mixing head pressure is crucial for consistent and efficient processing.

4.3 Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

• Design of Experiments (DOE): DOE techniques, such as factorial designs and response surface methodology (RSM), can be used to systematically investigate the effects of BDMAEE concentration, water content, isocyanate index, and other formulation variables on foam properties.

• Statistical Analysis: Statistical software can be used to analyze the experimental data and identify the optimal combination of variables that yields the desired foam properties.

Table 3: Optimization Strategies for BDMAEE Usage

5. Comparison with Other Amine Catalysts

While BDMAEE is a widely used blowing catalyst, other amine catalysts are also employed in flexible PU foam production, each with its own advantages and disadvantages.

• Triethylenediamine (TEDA): TEDA is a strong gelation catalyst that primarily promotes the polyol-isocyanate reaction. It is often used in combination with BDMAEE to achieve a balance between blowing and gelation.

• N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine (DMCHA): DMCHA is a versatile catalyst that exhibits both blowing and gelation activity. Its selectivity can be adjusted by varying its concentration and the presence of other additives.

• Pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA): PMDETA is a highly active catalyst that promotes both blowing and gelation reactions. It is often used in low concentrations to achieve fast cure rates.

Table 4: Comparison of Amine Catalysts

The choice of catalyst or catalyst blend depends on the specific formulation and desired foam properties. BDMAEE is often preferred when a strong blowing effect is required to achieve low density and good cell opening, while TEDA is used to enhance gelation and improve mechanical strength. DMCHA and PMDETA offer more versatility but require careful optimization to achieve the desired balance.

6. Safety and Handling Considerations

BDMAEE, like other amine catalysts, should be handled with care. It is a corrosive and potentially irritating substance. Proper safety precautions should be taken to avoid skin and eye contact, inhalation, and ingestion.

• Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): Wear appropriate PPE, including gloves, safety glasses, and a respirator, when handling BDMAEE.

• Ventilation: Work in a well-ventilated area to minimize inhalation of vapors.

• Storage: Store BDMAEE in a cool, dry place away from incompatible materials such as strong acids and oxidizers.

• Disposal: Dispose of BDMAEE waste according to local regulations.

7. Future Trends and Developments

Research and development efforts are focused on developing new and improved amine catalysts with enhanced selectivity, lower odor, and reduced volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. These new catalysts aim to provide better control over the foam formation process, improve foam properties, and address environmental concerns. Examples include:

• Reactive Amine Catalysts: These catalysts are chemically incorporated into the polymer matrix during the reaction, reducing VOC emissions and improving foam durability.

• Blocked Amine Catalysts: These catalysts are temporarily deactivated and released gradually during the reaction, providing better control over the cure profile.

• Bio-Based Amine Catalysts: These catalysts are derived from renewable resources, offering a more sustainable alternative to traditional petroleum-based catalysts.

Conclusion

Bis[2-(N,N-Dimethylaminoethyl)] ether (BDMAEE) is a valuable blowing catalyst in the production of flexible polyurethane foams. Its selective promotion of the water-isocyanate reaction allows for precise control over the blowing process, leading to foams with desirable properties such as low density, good cell opening, and optimal mechanical performance. However, achieving optimal results requires careful optimization of BDMAEE concentration, formulation adjustments, and consideration of processing parameters. Understanding the catalytic mechanism, influence on foam properties, and comparison with other amine catalysts is essential for effectively utilizing BDMAEE in flexible PU foam production. Continued research and development efforts are focused on developing new and improved amine catalysts with enhanced performance and reduced environmental impact, paving the way for more sustainable and high-performance flexible PU foams.

Literature Sources:

• Szycher, M. (1999). Szycher’s Handbook of Polyurethanes. CRC Press.
• Oertel, G. (1993). Polyurethane Handbook. Hanser Gardner Publications.
• Rand, L., & Frisch, K. C. (1962). Polyurethanes. Progress in Polymer Science, 2, 2-70.
• Woods, G. (1990). The ICI Polyurethanes Book. John Wiley & Sons.
• Ashida, K. (2006). Polyurethane and Related Foams: Chemistry and Technology. CRC Press.
• Saunders, J. H., & Frisch, K. C. (1962). Polyurethanes: Chemistry and Technology. Interscience Publishers.
• Proskurina, V. E., et al. "Kinetics of the reaction of isocyanates with water in the presence of tertiary amine catalysts." Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry 76.12 (2003): 1931-1935.
• Ferrigno, T. H. (2012). Rigid Polyurethane Foams: Technology and Applications. CRC Press.
• Hepburn, C. (1991). Polyurethane Elastomers. Elsevier Science Publishers.
• Klempner, D., & Frisch, K. C. (Eds.). (1991). Handbook of Polymeric Foams and Foam Technology. Hanser Gardner Publications.

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/pc-cat-tka-polyurethane-metal-carboxylate-catalyst-polycat-46/

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/delayed-strong-gel-catalyst-dabco-dc1-strong-gel-catalyst-dabco-dc1/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/dabco-eg-33-triethylenediamine-in-eg-solution-pc-cat-td-33eg/

Extended reading:https://www.newtopchem.com/archives/45194

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Triethylenediamine-CAS280-57-9-14-diazabicyclo2.2.2octane.pdf

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/nn-dimethyl-ethanolamine/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/lupragen-n301-catalyst-pentamethylenediethylenetriamine-basf/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/teda-l33b-polyurethane-amine-catalyst-tosoh/

Extended reading:https://www.cyclohexylamine.net/category/product/

Extended reading:https://www.bdmaee.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/31-6.jpg